On Set: Shoot the Rehearsal

There is a simple phrase that only three people on a film set like to hear. Those three persons being the producer, the assistant director, and any director crunched for time.  In the ears of any camera assistant, however, that same phrase means bad news bears. The phrase, of course, adorns the title of this article. Innocent sounding enough, as Ed Colman said over at CML, “when you are told to ‘shoot the rehearsal’ it’s not a rehearsal any more.”

Shooting the rehearsal means to film or record what would normally be considered a rehearsal. The main logic behind this practice is that it saves time. Rehearsals do take time and why not run the film or record to the drive and have that extra take? Especially now with shooting digital, the cost of recording to a hard drive isn’t the same as recording to raw stock. The third cog in this thinking is that magic can’t be repeated and if something unique happens during the rehearsal, you wouldn’t have caught it unless recording.

It’s hard to argue against many of these points, but rehearsals are very important for a variety of reasons. They are crucial to many crew members on set and allow everyone to get a practice run in before tossing up the slate and clapping the sticks. Rehearsals allow key members of the crew such as the cinematographer/DP, production designer, and make-up to get last looks on their respective lights, sets, and make-up. Rehearsals also allow dolly grips to hone complicated moves, Steadicam operators to master their flow, as well as camera assistants to grab focus marks and see the action.

What shooting the rehearsal does is effectively move all of these last-minute changes into an actual take. While it sounds harmless, the fear that many crew members have is that this take may actually end up in the film without their last minute changes/tweaks and it will degrade their work to a small degree. For a camera assistant, this includes focus. Oftentimes I have been asked to shoot the rehearsal without ever seeing the scene blocked out. Following focus with unpredictable action is less than ideal unless shooting on an 18mm stopped down to T-11 so my depth of field gives me the most leeway I’d ever need.

In fact, I can think of only a few scenarios where I am completely OK with shooting the rehearsal. The first, I mentioned above, is when there is a wide lens with large depth of field and pulling focus on the fly is more than manageable.

The second is if the camera move is unpredictable and can’t be repeated. This situation recently came up for me on a short film that took place at a convention. The camera was on handheld and was going to float through the crowd and I was supposed to catch focus on whatever I could. In this case, there isn’t really a defined move as the camera and the convention goers are going to move among each other different everytime. There isn’t much for me to practice since there are too many variables to change.

The third scenario is if there is a camera move that is hard to replicate. Sometimes a camera move will be difficult and take a long time to reset. In this situation I try to grab marks as best as I can and rehearse as much as I can without doing the entire move. It’s hard to argue when you know something will be challenging.

Other than that, shooting the rehearsal is a bad habit to get into, I believe. It makes it tough for crew to get their jobs done correctly and it risks a less-than-perfect take ending up on the silver screen. The thing about shooting a rehearsal is that I am not always 100% confident in my ability to pull it off and that is not a position I like to be in. My job as 1st AC/focus puller is to make sure everything maintains as crisp focus as possible and having to put forth an effort that may not result in a full completion of the job makes me uneasy.

Focus pulling, especially on longer lenses, is a tough job and one that requires precision, practice, and a certain amount of touch. Rehearsals, no matter how brief, allow me to master that and deliver under the tremendous pressure that is normally there. It may not sound that bad, but when you have a group of people standing around a monitor watching an image go soft, everyone knows whose fault it is (when you want to be invisible). And when you shoot the rehearsal, and the subject goes soft, nobody is thinking that it’s a rehearsal anymore; they’re all thinking about how you just blew the “take.”

About the author:

About the author: Evan Luzi is the editor and founder of The Black and Blue as well as a freelance camera assistant.

You can learn more about him or follow him on Twitter and Google+.

This Isn't About One Gig. It's About Launching Your Career.
  • Pingback: Prop Guns Don’t Kill People, Accidents Do - Tips for Filmmakers and Camera Assistants - The Black and Blue

  • Blargh

    I was on a small 2 shot shoot yesterday, where we were hours ahead of schedule, but the director still wanted to shoot the rehearsal. Shooting on an 85 wide open and tracking in and out with a depth of field shorter than the talents nose.

  • Daniel Mimura

    I understand the reasons not to shoot the rehearsals…but as a steadicam op, I LOVE to see it.  You can’t objectively see the take b/c you can’t have your body squarely situated in front of the monitor as you’re going thru it…

    …and for what you mention as the 3rd scenario…these are the exact same reasons as an operator, that I do want to record rehearsals…the longer the take, the more intricate it is, the more it helps to objectively think about it by watching it.  It’s really hard to talk about moves instead of see them…the more I can objectively and quantifiably communicate with the director about getting the placement better. 

    It’s really tiring being in the rig and having the director tell you (a couple feet over here…hold there longer…)…and not just go thru it in playback.

    I’ve AC-ed, (in the film days when filming rehearsals wasn’t an issue) and I definitely understand how it feels from that perspective.

  • http://www.theblackandblue.com/ Evan

    Hey Daniel, thanks for sharing your perspective. That makes total sense. And in some cases, I’ve asked to record a rehearsal for the same reason (for instance if I can’t see my marks during a complicated shot and want to see if I nailed it).

    And that’s a totally understandable reason to shoot the rehearsal. But the agreement there is that recording it is for improvement and rehearsal purposes.

    What gets dangerous is when you’re recording rehearsals and then treating them as takes. If you are going to shoot the rehearsal, as a director, at least understand that the entire shot may not be perfect. In fact, most of it may be unusable.

    That’s more of what I’m against — skipping rehearsal and trying to nail it on take 1. 

    Otherwise, I’m all for shooting the rehearsal if it gives someone on the crew the opportunity to do their job better.

  • Daniel Mimura

    Yeah…some directors think, “hey, it may just work out right if we go ahead and shoot this”…   There are some definite benefits of the pressures of shooting on film…  Yes, you can shoot more now most of the time, but it doesn’t matter if it’s going to look amateurish b/c it hasn’t been all worked out yet.  It’s all about timing, it being a temporal medium, and this is the part that you just can’t know (for focus or operating, for blocking) until spending some time figuring out all the beats…
    Love your blog, btw…I first saw it when I was looking up some steadicam thing a long time ago and saw the franken-rig or whatever and now I’ve been re-introduced thru nofilmschool and I’ve been catching up on old posts (And after that, read your book.)   Keep up the good work.  I wish there was something like this when I ACed… 

  • http://www.theblackandblue.com/ Evan

    Ah yes the frankenstein steadicam. That was a fun post to do. I’m really happy you came back and are enjoying everything. The goal is to make this site a go-to for AC’s so people can learn the right way and not make as many mistakes on set!

    P.S. In the future when you reply to a comment, hitting “reply” makes it easier to keep track. Not trying to be nit-picky, just a friendly suggestion :)

  • Martin

     Yeah, this puzzles me too.  Clint Eastwood famously shoots his rehearsals.  Maybe that give people the confidence to do this but I’ve never understood how it works and I think you’ve pointed out all the flaws.  Maybe shooting the whole scene on a wide without focus pulls is how Eastwood works.  Or maybe he calls them rehearsals for the actors’ sake (reducing pressure on them – a good thing) but camera ad sound are prepped, blocked and ready for what is in reality the first take.

  • http://www.theblackandblue.com/ Evan

    It’s mostly about attitude. I’m sure someone like Clint Eastwood shoots rehearsals with the expectation that a large portion of the take will be unusable (he’s got film to burn), but rolls anyway in case something “magical” happens. Where it gets dangerous is when directors roll on rehearsal, but expect or demand a level of perfection that only happens after several takes.

    I can’t help but roll my eyes if a director asks to shoot the rehearsal and then complains about a shot being out of focus, or a missed camera move, or something else. 

  • Martin

    Evan, I dug a little deeper into Eastwood’s method.  I reckon he epitomizes one of your themes: that it’s important to learn your craft.  Apparently his cast are regularly surprised to find themselves moved on to the next setup.  They hadn’t even noticed the camera was rolling.  He doesn’t shoot rehearsals just tells his actors that’s what’s happening.  The rehearsal takes are all, in effect, the first take.  Also, he doesn’t burn through film stock.  He shoots tight ratios, frequently wraps his shoots early, and always comes in under budget.  For him, it’s all about the preparation.  A model director/producer who took the time to learn on set how to make a film (and how not to).  All directors should serve similar apprenticeships.